![]() |
|
|---|
Disaster struck Iran again. On Wednesday, a cargo train loaded with fuel, fertilizers and other nasty chemicals went off tracks at a rail station near the city of Neyshabur leading to a giant explosion shortly afterwards. The official death toll runs around 320 with another 460 injured. The second saddest thing to the incident itself in every such disaster is the public apathy and complacency that follows.
There always seems to be a justification or some simple-minded reasoning that tends to deflect people's minds from scrutiny into the root cause of the incident and holding someone or some agency responsible. Earthquakes, of course, are a natural disaster—an "act of god." What can we do about nature? Planes crash because of US embargo—all those big aerospace companies that are denying us spare parts or new planes. It is totally out of our hands! But no one seriously asks who authorized those flimsy brick houses (tombs, better to call them) to sprawl in a proven earthquake-prone region or who cleared those ailing aircrafts to fly without proper maintenance? As if poor decision making or mismanagement never played any role in the loss of innocent life in these supposedly out-of-our-control disasters.
But this time it is a fatal train explosion that needs explanation. Lets think about it for a moment. A chain of wagons loaded with fuel and fertilizer—the same combustible recipe that blasted the Oklahoma City federal building in 1995 and took the lives of 168 people in the worst pre-911 act of terrorism in the American history—moving through a populated residential area in Iran, apparently without proper safety measures in place. Which "dark forces&" are to blame for this one? Even if those ill-fated firefighters (and bystanders) had been informed of the contents of the train soon enough, so many people would not be gathering around the wreckage after the initial derailment and the human toll would not have been so high. Who is really responsible for these senseless losses of life? Iran is posed to inaugurate its ambitious nuclear energy program within the next few years. Who is then going to take responsibility for the safe transport of radioactive material around the country?
Let me be clear on one thing: I am not a die-hard fan of western-style democratization of the developing world, nor I buy all those hooplas about how perfect the American democracy is. But if there is one good thing about democratic societies, it is their core concept of accountability. Meaning that people have the tools to freely scrutinize, disapprove, confront, challenge, hold responsible or impeach their public officials for the decisions that they make, especially when those decisions affect public safety and security. In that sense, it may not be an exaggeration to claim that today in Iran more ordinary people silently fall victim to the lack of democracy, than those who bluntly shout for it on the streets.
I don't know if the zeitgeist in post disaster Iran can really be called apathy and complacency. How about depression and hopelessness? There is actually a specific word, which was used a lot in post WWII France. I'm thinking of Camus and Sartre, but the specific word escapes me. Didier? Can you help me? Anyway, it means a pervasive sense of having absolutely no control of the world around you, just existing in a stoic state of perpetual suffering and loss. Alienation? Existential melancholy? Post Traumatic Stress Disorder?
Whatever.
When nothing can be done, there is no point in doing anything.
As far as American accountability, we owe it to having an independent judiciary system. When the judges are corrupt or intimidated into whoredom by the powers that be, then accountability decreases proportionally to who you know, and how much you can pay.
Either I can not find or there is not any information about the author even in the guest authors list. You normally put a short background of each author there but has the policy changed recently?
American Woman, thanks for the comment. Perhaps "subdued" or "submissive" is the word you're looking for. That certainly applies to people who were directly affected by the disaster, i.e. lost a love one. But for those citizens who are looking at it from a distance, I think complacency is a better description of their response.
Perhaps having a healthy competition for the control of executive power and a free press to blow whistle at the right time can be as effective as an independent judiciary in pushing for greater accountability.
American woman, I would call that, the existential "angst" of a moribund race.